Connect with us

Breaking

BOOM! Robert Mueller Asks For Postponement In Michael Flynn Sentencing…Here Are The Details

Is the Trump-Russia collusion witch hunt about to blow up in special counsel Robert Mueller’s face?

We have now discovered that the House Intelligence Committee recently leaked a 51-page unclassified transcript of the combative meeting between Republicans and Democrats.

During the  meeting members voted to release to the public the classified memo making its rounds in Congress that allegedly shows government surveillance abuses. Within the transcript we can clearly see Democrats strongly dismissing the release, and accusing Republicans of creating the memo in order to benefit the POTUS.

Many GOP lawmakers are describing the four-page memo as “shocking,” “troubling” and “alarming.” One congressman even compared the details to accounts of KGB activity in Russia. Many that have seen the memo feel it shows what place the unproven anti-Trump “dossier” danced around in the application for a surveillance warrant on Trump’s associate.

Via 100percentfedup:

Is the Trump-Russia collusion witch hunt about to blow up in special counsel Robert Mueller’s face?

The Last Refuge is now reporting that Robert Mueller is now requesting a postponement of General Michael Flynn’s sentencing… against a newly discovered likelihood the Robert Mueller investigation began under false pretenses; and against the backdrop that FBI surveillance and wiretaps were obtained through materially (intentionally) false representations to the FISA court; and against the backdrop the original Flynn plea judge (Contrereas) was also the approving FISA judge; and that judge ‘was summarily recused’ from the case; and against increasing evidence that Mike Flynn was set up by a terminal animus, and politically-motivated investigative rogue unit, operating within the FBI; and against surfacing IG Horowitz evidence that FBI investigators manipulated (lied on) their FD-302 interrogation documents; and understanding those falsified 302’s were used in the Mueller/Flynn charging document…

…Special Counsel Robert Mueller now asks for postponement of sentencing:

Both parties did not ‘request‘ a postponement; both parties ‘agreed‘ to a postponement. The motive for the request (Mueller) is entirely divergent from, yet complementary to, the motive to agree to the request (Flynn).

This is all beginning to go backwards.

It is not coincidental that Brandon L Van Grack is the signatory to the delay request by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s request to the new Judge, Emmet G Sullivan.

If, as has been reported, Inspector General Michael Horowitz now has evidence the FBI manipulated their FD-302 (interrogation and questioning) documents, as also admitted by FBI agent Peter Strzok in related matters regarding Clinton…

…. and those manipulated or falsified FBI 302’s (containing FBI investigative notes of Michael Flynn’s questioning during the January 2017 interview), were used in the actual Flynn charging documents.

Well, then the underlying evidence presented to the initial judge, Ruben Contreras, in the December 1st plea hearing, were materially misrepresented.

The Washington Times reports that in early December 2017, Judge Rudolph Contreras was recused from the criminal case involving Gen. Michael Flynn who had pleaded guilty in an arrangement with Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

The statement from the US District Court was direct and did not offer any explanation:

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia judge presiding over the criminal case for President Donald Trump’s former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn has been recused from handling the case, a court spokeswoman said on Thursday.

According to a court filing, U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras, who presided over a Dec. 1 hearing where Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation about his contacts with Russia, will no longer handle the case.

Court spokeswoman Lisa Klem did not say why Contreras was recused and added that the case was randomly reassigned.

The use of the term “was recused” is noteworthy as the court spokesperson purposely did not use the terminology “recused himself” with regard to Contreras removal from the case. The terms are not necessarily interchangeable and the “was recused” phrasing suggests that Contreras was told to recuse himself rather than the judge voluntarily stepping away from the case based on his own concern for a conflict of interest.

According to Joe DiGenova, a former US Attorney for the District of Columbia, Contreras was, in fact, removed from the case. DiGenova revealed the claim during an interview earlier this month on WMAL radio in Washington DC

LISTEN:

With the IG exposing falsified and manipulative investigative practices by the FBI, Mueller would have no alternative but to throw the brakes on. This whole thing is turning into a sh*t-show of epic proportions.

 


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Breaking

Trending

To Top