Buzzworthy

Extremely Graphic: 3 Brutal Videos Of Cars Crushing Protesters Blocking The Road

on

VIA| Protests are breaking out across the country, as many people who voted for someone other than Trump can’t understand why they don’t always get what they want and think they’re part of a “movement” by protesting the election results.

As infuriating as they may be, sometimes, they make us laugh.

A video posted by the Daily Caller shows a compilation of protesters trying to block traffic and failing miserably.

Enjoy! Warning: Strong content!

Watch:

#2


#3

About Myron Cohen

31 Comments

  1. Bob Gray

    June 20, 2017 at 9:35 am

    Did not show my favorite. The one from Baton Rouge when the driver showed his pistol. The brave souls scattered like a covey of quail.

    • tomcain

      July 19, 2017 at 9:44 am

      I do not see any pedestrian crosswalk markings on the road or road side signs. I think the pedestrians are at fault.

    • BEETA

      July 22, 2017 at 9:49 pm

      LOVE IT.

  2. Firehawk jj

    June 20, 2017 at 10:04 am

    RANT TIME:
    The laws, Penal & Traffic Codes, need a serious update, and/or amendments as they relate to the increasing and dangerous behaviors, actions and the tools or methods of protest utilized and abused by protesters and their actions that effect the safety, welfare and protection of the general public, businesses, first responders and law enforcement.
    This right is defined and expressed in the First Amendment of the constitution… The Right to protest is a guarantee and inherent to all “LEGAL Citizens” by the Constitution of the United States. It is defined in that Constitution as follows; “Congress shall make no law respecting …the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” … ‘people’ defined as “legal native or legally immigrated citizens” possessing the rightful privilege to vote to express their choice and position in the matters of government and representation, that pay taxes to support the operation of their government and its responsibilities…
    It does not allow for protesters to impair, impose or interfere the free progress with and/or threaten the safety of others or properties, private or business… that is, to otherwise by their assembly of protest they cannot limit, block or impair those not participating, disagreeing or opposing the purpose of said protests by impairing or blocking public, or private, egress; streets, roadways or highways. Further more protesters cannot vandalize or destroy properties, public, private or businesses. Nor are they permitted to use abusive or violent behaviors to express their positions.
    The First & Fourteenth Amendments define and address the parameters and limits of protests and it’s participants. It further identifies certain requirements that may be imposed by Federal, State and Local Governments… The First Amendment to the Constitution prohibits the United States Congress from enacting legislation that would abridge the right of the people to assemble peaceably. The Fourteenth Amendment makes this prohibition applicable to state and local governments.
    The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the First Amendment protects the right to conduct a peaceful public assembly. The right to assemble is not, however, absolute. Government officials cannot simply prohibit a public assembly in their own discretion, but the government can impose restrictions on the time, place, and manner of peaceful assembly, provided that constitutional safeguards are met. Time, place, and manner restrictions are permissible so long as they “are justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech, . . . are narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest, and . . . leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information.”
    Such time, place, and manner restrictions can take the form of requirements to obtain a permit for an assembly. The Supreme Court has held that it is constitutionally permissible for the government to require that a permit for a peaceful assembly be obtained in advance. The government can also make special regulations that impose additional requirements for assemblies that take place near other major public or private events.
    The organizer(s) of a public assembly must typically apply for and obtain a permit in advance from the local police department or other local governmental body. Applications for permits usually require, at a minimum, information about the specific date, time, and location of the proposed assembly, and may require a great deal more information. Localities can, within the boundaries of Supreme Court decisions interpreting the First Amendment right to assemble peaceably, impose additional requirements for permit applications, such as information about the organizer of the assembly and specific details about how the assembly is to be conducted.
    The 1st Amendment does not provide the right to conduct an assembly at which there is a clear and present danger of riot, disorder, or interference with traffic on public streets, or other immediate threat to public safety or order. Statutes that prohibit protesters from assembling and using force or violence and/or violating crimes against properties, by committing vandalism, damaging or destroying properties,, to accomplish unlawful goals or purposes are permitted to impose those limits as statutes by state and local governments under the 1st Amendment. And that the responsibility for and potential of prosecution for violating the limits lies not only on the perpetrators of the acts but on the organizers of the assembly as well….
    So… wow! I got carried away again…sorry… but.. after In the event that, for example, a protest or march that the participants impair or block a roadway or highway with the intent to impede, obstruct or prevent others, non-participants, even that are in opposition, from progressing, preventing or causing delays, intentionally taking the time of others, not permitting progress in the timely expectation and impairing the “pursuit of happiness”. And in the event that protest participants violate the provisions of assembly and are injured, or worse, by their acts, (e.g. standing in the middle of a highway), the responsibility of, and prosecution of, those involved in the event should lie with the actors, (the one’s standing in the roadway that get plowed down), as well as the organizers identified in the permit documentation… Or the perpetrators committing acts of vandalism or destruction of property should be held as responsible, financially and legal prosecution in the violations and the end results…

    • Frances Carlson

      July 19, 2017 at 4:38 pm

      Love your rant.

    • Ken Depew

      July 22, 2017 at 8:39 am

      Thank you.

    • Able

      July 22, 2017 at 3:55 pm

      Your Right to Protest | ACLU of Oregon
      https://aclu-or.org/en/know-your-rights/your-right-protest
      You have a constitutionally protected right to engage in peaceful protest in … A protest that blocks vehicular or pedestrian traffic is illegal without a permit.

    • Able

      July 22, 2017 at 3:57 pm

      Is It Legal for Protesters to Block Traffic? – FindLaw Blotter
      blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2016/09/is-it-legal-for-protesters-to-block-traffic.html
      Sep 26, 2016 – Blocking traffic is not legal and is not a new practice for protesters. When protesters block traffic, they are engaging in civil disobedience,

    • William Pike

      July 25, 2017 at 8:07 am

      the problem is that the definition of “peaceful protest” has become blurred. Back in the day when we were protesting the Vietnam war, we learned fast where we could and could not protest,, public property (parks, sidewalks,) are permissible as long as you do NOT block entrance or exit to or from businesses or offices (in the case of goverment buildings) blocking such access violates the business’ rights.. Private property is an NO NO,, without the permission of the property owner,,,, some of this changed with the Patriot act,,, part of that act was to define blocking roads and highways as a terrorist act,,, the idea is that a terrorist cell would attempt to disrupt traffic and prevent first responders from reaching where they need to be,, stop doctors and health care professionals from reaching hospitals and triage locations,,, for some reason the goverment is afraid to enforce this law,,,, Any person who knowingly and intentionally blocks a highway or roadway as to stop the flow of traffic shall be considered a domestic terrorist, and the act of intentionally blocking such roadways shall be considered an act of domestic terrorism.

  3. H. Johnson

    June 22, 2017 at 8:50 am

    I see no way to fault anyone that chooses to keep driving through these illegal roadblocks. These “protesters” have been shown to be capable of violence. Stopping for them could place me in danger of personal injury. Keep driving…if someone is going to get hurt…better them than me.

    • Jeff DeWitt

      July 23, 2017 at 2:42 pm

      Yep, remember Reginald Denny.

  4. Bobby

    June 22, 2017 at 10:12 am

    Stay out of the road.. What was your first cue?

  5. Julie

    June 22, 2017 at 8:40 pm

    Nonya too bright if you chose to block traffic during your protest. Actions have consequences. Group think not helpful in this situation.

  6. John McGowan

    June 24, 2017 at 4:41 am

    If you are that stupid to get out there, you get what you ask for. A person with a low IQ should know that

  7. 'lkjv

    June 24, 2017 at 1:59 pm

    they act shocked the cars kept going through. omg omg omg omg

  8. Kathy Wilson

    June 25, 2017 at 1:03 am

    Serves them right for getting hit. Freedom of speech does not give anyone the right to take my freedom to get where I need to go. IF you block my path, I will not slam on the gas, but you will get one warning before I begin to go forward, you refuse to get out of my way. then it is your own damn fault!! You swarm my car and threaten me,you get no warning I will then slam on the gas, I will play threw you or over you, if I feel threatened. STAY THE HELL OUT OF THE ROADS!!!!

  9. Bill Wilson

    June 25, 2017 at 5:59 pm

    Obstructing traffic is a crime. Jay walking is a crime. Walking all over someone else’s right to go about their lives unencumbered and unhindered should be a crime if it isn’t. If you are idjit enough to step out into traffic with the intent of stopping or hindering that traffic you get what you deserve. I have been car-jacked before and I have known people that were also car-jacked. One died as the result. If you step out in front of me I WILL NOT stop for you to rip me off or injure me or my family. I do NOT care if that is not your intent. I will not take the chance that it may be.

  10. KT

    July 5, 2017 at 8:05 am

    “Horrifically Brutal” ?!
    More like incredibly satisfying.
    How dumb do you have to be to stand in the middle of traffic….

  11. Stephen Newman

    July 5, 2017 at 6:13 pm

    Fu2k them stupid people .. Pla with fire and you get burned . plain in the street and get your ass run over

  12. Gump

    July 6, 2017 at 5:16 pm

    Mamma always said stay out of the road or you’ll be like a box of squished chocolates.

  13. Joanne

    July 9, 2017 at 3:00 pm

    It’s against the law to block traffic. If the police would ARREST all those blocking traffic and simply STOP TOLERATING this behavior (with resulting arrests) this insane seemingly growing habit would for the most part stop. WHY are any of these wingnuts being allowed to block traffic in the FIRST PLACE? It’s stupid, it’s dangerous, and it’s AGAINST THE LAW!

  14. joe

    July 19, 2017 at 8:43 am

    these are the dumbest people on earth. LMAO

  15. Jan

    July 19, 2017 at 8:55 am

    Lay on the horn and keep going!

  16. tomcain

    July 19, 2017 at 9:48 am

    I see NO crosswalk markings of any kind on the roadway, nor road side signs stating “pedestrian crossing” Ignorant is as ignorant does.

  17. Pat Dietrich

    July 19, 2017 at 4:17 pm

    If they get hit, they deserve it. Hard lesson to learn. They reap what they sow!

  18. ConnieJs

    July 20, 2017 at 2:44 pm

    They need to do their “protesting” from behind prison bars. Load them up and haul them off. Any remaining ones can be ‘street fodder’. Public streets are for motor vehicles. If one chooses to stand in it, they’re ‘fair game’.

  19. Bill

    July 22, 2017 at 3:11 pm

    If you arecon the road like a vehicle, I will run your ass over. Protest that!!!

  20. BEETA

    July 22, 2017 at 9:54 pm

    I DON’T THINK IT IS HORRIFIC.. I THINK THEY ARE GETTING WHAT THEY ARE ASKING FOR. SO YOU HAVE A BEEF ABOUT SOMETHING.. NOT MY PROBLEM SO TAKE IT SOMEWHERE ELSE. I WILL RUN YOU DOWN WITH OUT HESITATION FOR I WILL FEEL THREATENED BY THE LIKES OF THESE NUTTS. DON’T BE IN THE ROAD WHEN I COME THROUGH FOR IT MIGHT NOT BE PRETTY. IF YOUR IGNORANT AZZ IN IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD AND YOU ARE NOT SMART ENOUGH TO KNOW THAT YOU DO NOT STAND IN THE ROAD , OH WELL.. DOG GONE..

  21. Eddie

    July 23, 2017 at 4:09 am

    If you have a complaint do not block the road, there is no negotiation when a mob tries to stop my vehicle it is a basic hold up a stop stand & deliver situation,
    I will not endanger my family or my self by stopping to the demand of a mob ever.

  22. Evans Evans

    August 14, 2017 at 5:37 am

    Those fucking niggers got punked!

  23. karl hide

    August 15, 2017 at 2:46 am

    if you want to put your live at risk i will oblige, fucking inbreed twats

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *